The Judgment Day has already started to feel the heat of dissent amongst their ranks and truth be told, it is coming to a head-on finish as per the latest reports. Now, obviously there are a lot of speculations which will be running riots but how many of them somewhat walks down the same road.
So what is going to be the telling blow to the aspirations of Judgment Day? Well, the answer probably is R Truth. But then with that being said, here are three ways in which the WWE’s one of most villainous factions, the Judgment day forged by Edge and now taken care of by Priest, Rhea and Dominik come to an end.
#1 R Truth finally plants a seed of dissent in Damian Priest’s head
Despite R Truth costing a match for JD against Drew McIntyre and the latter pushing off Ron Killings in the process, the agony of trying to stave away R Truth was palpable on the face of Damian Priest. The two have been bonding over each other and that has somehow planted the seeds in Damian’s head that he is almost single-handedly running the Judgment Day. Rhea Ripley isn’t happy. Dom doesn’t have a say. JD McDonagh is a figment.
Finn Balor seems to be going against the Archer of Infamy. So what exactly is going wrong? Well, the answer is simple, the seed of dissent is strong in the Archer of Infamy.
#2 Damian Priest cross of Rhea Ripley
Damian may end up crossing Rhea Ripley completely and that is what can be the most major seed of destruction for Judgment Day. Truth being both Rhea and Damian are the ones who run JD and they being at crossroads with each other makes the future pretty bleak for the WWE faction. So what exactly is the play? Well, the answer being the faction splits up with their own set of fighters.
#3 R Truth sets Judgment Day ablaze
With his latest set of shenanigans, R Truth may be actually separating the forces of Judgment Day. He has started with Rhea and Damian and his closeness with the Archer of Infamy makes it a worrisome moment for the fans that his whims will be breaking apart the entire faction as it is already running on borrowed time.
